All these big wigs telling us how great the new vaccine is...

Current affairs, gossip and general conversation

Re: All these big wigs telling us how great the new vaccine is...

Postby rebbonk » Fri Apr 18, 2025 6:07 pm

I have no idea about the veracity of this, but it's an interesting read...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/
Of course it'll fit; you just need a bigger hammer.
User avatar
rebbonk
 
Posts: 72221
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:01 am

Re: All these big wigs telling us how great the new vaccine is...

Postby rebbonk » Tue Jan 06, 2026 1:32 pm

More evidence of a link between covid jabs and cancer

ON the Friday before Christmas, Health NZ quietly released the 2023 New Zealand cancer data to a media preoccupied with festive trivia. Not surprisingly, the figures received zero press coverage.

The Hatchard Report has released an updated version of my Substack analysis because, in terms of historical trends, the figures contain alarming information that points to our worst fears. The trend included an 8 per cent increase in cancer rates among mature working adults.

Image

The NZ data is not an isolated finding. Official figures from England show an almost identical trend. New cancer registration rates per 1,000 population for the 0-64 age range in 2023 (the latest available figures) are up 8.8 per cent compared with the average pre-pandemic rate for 2015-2019.

In other words, as in NZ, the burden of cancer incidence in England is increasingly falling upon younger age groups, including working-age adults. This is a novel and alarming trend, but health authorities have largely chosen to remain silent or blame it on the usual suspects.

The trend in the UK is confirmed by oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish, who has reported a startling rise in melanoma relapse rates among those of his patients who received a covid booster vaccine. According to Professor Dalgleish this is affecting even some who had been in remission and cancer-free for decades.

Relapse rates among cancer patients in remission are not included in the annual new cancer registration data, so the rise in cancer incidence may be higher than the 2023 figures indicate.

Professor Dalgleish describes his findings as a ‘red flag’, just as we described the latest NZ data as a red flag, at the very least pointing to vaccine-induced immune exhaustion. A red flag means: stop immediately, reassess and take urgent remedial action.

The last available new cancer registration figures for the whole of Australia date to 2021, four years behind the latest data, but the state of Victoria has released more recent figures. They include 2024 data which show cancer rates to be at a historical high, also featuring disturbingly increased rates among working-age adults.

Unbelievably, figures from Canada are even more out of date, ending in 2020.

Recent published assessments are largely misleading projections based on out of date pre-pandemic trends.

This tardy and inadequate approach to public health monitoring is being pursued despite published studies conducted in Korea, Japan and Italy linking covid vaccination with elevated cancer incidence or complication.

The overall picture is one of a well-paid army of health bureaucrats compiling figures years out of date and then not bothering or caring to assess the obvious implications, instead blaming any rise on ageing populations.

Almost five years ago, biotech researchers with the support of the global pharmaceutical industry and governments around the world launched a forced global vaccination programme affecting billions of people. Dozens of types of novel bio-vaccines were used for the first time on humans. There had already been discernible red flags following animal and then human trials, but they were ignored. Why?

We now know covid vaccination was a reckless experiment that went horribly wrong. It was associated with a record level of proximate adverse effects including cardiac disease, strokes, neurological illness, kidney disease, reproductive issues, immunological disease and mental illness.

The latest cancer data open another chapter in the ongoing covid vaccination saga of adverse effects and excess deaths.

As many, including the Hatchard Report, predicted right from the start, there will be long-term effects. It appears these are now materialising, a trend that governments are very anxious to hide.

There couldn’t have been a more obvious indication of an attempt at misdirection than the award in the NZ New Year’s Honours List of Knight Companion to Professor Graham Le Gros for contributions to medicine.

Professor Le Gros famously told the NZ Royal Commission on Covid-19 Phase 2 that the clinical trials of the covid mRNA vaccine were not rushed and were sufficient to show it was safe and effective. How could they be sufficient? There was and has been since no controlled assessment of long-term outcomes.

The take-home result of the long-running covid vaccine saga is clear. Biotechnologists incorrectly predicted the novel genetic style of vaccination would be effective at prevention of transmission and it would be safe. They were not just wrong, they were fundamentally wrong. The pandemic outcomes have revealed our understanding of genetic functions and their interaction with the immune system is deficient. It is incomplete.

At this point, any attempt to prevent or obscure the need for a vigorous reassessment of pandemic outcomes across the entire spectrum of major medical conditions comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated amounts to nothing less than medical negligence and reckless disregard of public health.

There has to be an end to the mRNA vaccine harm cover up and a systemic purging of the inertia and indifference affecting our moribund medical establishment.

Continuing to assert that covid vaccine harm is unproven whilst encouraging booster uptake and refusing to study comparative data has long since become an untenable position.

In 2026 we aim to bring the unequivocal data to the attention of all those taking public health decisions.
source: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/more-evidence-of-a-causal-link-between-covid-jabs-and-cancer/
Of course it'll fit; you just need a bigger hammer.
User avatar
rebbonk
 
Posts: 72221
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:01 am

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

  • Ads