388 homes to go on former Coventry greenbelt as houses 'desperately needed' but locals 'fed up'
Hundreds of homes will be built on former Coventry green belt land as councillors say the city needs housing. But residents are said to be "fed up" with the level of development near them, a meeting heard.
Plans for a 388-home estate on farmland in Keresley were approved unanimously by the city's Planning Committee last Thursday (2 November.) Committee Member Cllr Kevin Maton (Lab) stressed homes are needed and urged people to watch recent documentaries on the UK housing crisis.
"We need these houses. The people of Coventry, the people who want to move to Coventry, the people who work in Coventry, need housing," he added.
Meeting chair Cllr Lindsley Harvard (Lab) agreed, saying Cllr Maton is "absolutely right, those houses are desperately needed."
He referred to 16 and a half thousand families on the housing waiting list and thousands of young people "desperate to get on the housing ladder."
"The housing, it looks quite nice and it's good to see a lot of green space left within the development," he added.
Councillor Ryan Simpson (Con), also on the committee, said he personally doesn't think it's a great site for housing as nearby Holyhead and Radford Roads are "already struggling."
"But that's been settled, it's in the local plan, it's been allocated and that's not up for debate today," he added.
Councillors voted to give the project planning permission, as had been recommended by council officers.
The scheme includes 388 homes, of which 97 will be affordable, six hectares of open space and over £9 million for local infrastructure and services.
The development is part of an 'urban extension' in Keresley involving 3,100 homes, a primary school and new link road set out in the 2017 'Local Plan.'
Controversially, the plan agreed some sites could be removed from green belt and built on as figures based on population estimates showed the city needed over 40,000 new homes in twenty years.
More than 2,400 of the planned homes in Keresley now have at least outline permission, according to a report for Thursday's meeting.
But the projects are affecting residents, with one saying he will be living "in the middle of a construction site," the meeting heard.
Other concerns had been raised over the scheme which was hit with 17 objections after being considered for three years by the council - though an earlier version for 444 homes got over 100 objections.
At the meeting on Thursday, ward councillor Steven Keough (Con) said local residents are "really fed up with the builds."
"This is going to have a lot of negative aspects on their housing, on their view that they have and also on the price of their houses," he claimed.
He also pointed to a "similar scenario" in Tamworth Road which had a "big impact" on access and traffic.
A local man told councillors they have a "duty of care to minimise the impact on local residents, the protection of the environment and its wildlife."
He called for a section of a planned link road to be built before more developments get the go ahead, adding: "We cannot allow this to become the equivalent of Coventry's HS2 Northern Section."
The resident also said local services should be built at the same time as housing.
"Nothing I say here today is going to stop the building of houses," he added.
"But I plead to you, the Planning Committee, to consider the time frame implications with all that is happening in Keresley and the impact on the mental health of residents.
"Certainly for the remainder of my lifetime, unless I move, I will be living in the midst of a construction site."
Others questioned the need for the scheme and highlighted the impact on the greenfield land.
"Tragically this plan is based [on] over estimated population growth calculations made and based on bad data and used to justify the development on green belt in Coventry," ward councillor Jandu (Con) told the meeting.
"The plan is the wrong proposal in the wrong place," he added, calling for a 'brownfield first' approach.
His colleague Cllr Birdi (Con) added in a statement the land is used by farmers, a parish council and ramblers.
Covering it in houses would "destroy the scenic greenfield land, never to be seen again in years," he said.
