That's an interesting shot, dutchman! (As are the others above it!) When I knew the City Arcade it had its glass in the roof replaced, although there were a few gaps. (And no rubble about!!

) Some of the shops had been nicely painted up, and looked like they had never been damaged - though they probably had - but one thing the photo doesn't sow is that the paved way actually had at least two steps in it; it went downhill from Smithford St to the Barracks Square. There are two things that stuck in my sensory memory more than anything else: all the glass amplified the sound of footsteps; and it had a distinctive smell about it, probably from the various goods that were sold in there, like open groceries and fish, meat, greens, all of which mingled and hung around. And of course, there was the smell of people's clothes. With most clothes being of natural fibres (wool, cotton) and the old fashioned washing powders and use of mothballs, everyone had their own private aroma! By no means unpleasant (although people couldn't bath too frequently, with water restrictions) but nothing like today, where you smell aftershave, eau de toilette, etc. Women's perfume was a very rare aroma in the very early 1950s!
I understand that the Drinkwater Arcade was even nicer, and very Art Nouveau, but I've never seen a photograph inside it - and I think only one outside. It must have been a very pleasant city in the 1930s.
Thanks for pointing me at the post. But a question about it: you said "the original City Arms" - that doesn't look like the City Arms that I recall in Fleet St....or the other photo that I saw posted of it elsewhere...?