The Rise And Fall Of Triumph Cars - How Tragedy KILLED a British ICON

Pictures, maps, memories and stories

The Rise And Fall Of Triumph Cars - How Tragedy KILLED a British ICON

Postby dutchman » Fri Mar 28, 2025 4:11 am

Please note, I don't necessarily share the opinions expressed in this video, some of which seem more for dramatic effect than historical accuracy.

User avatar
dutchman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 55234
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:24 am
Location: Spon End

Re: The Rise And Fall Of Triumph Cars - How Tragedy KILLED a British ICON

Postby rebbonk » Fri Mar 28, 2025 10:53 am

Interesting find :thumbsup:
Of course it'll fit; you just need a bigger hammer.
User avatar
rebbonk
 
Posts: 70290
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:01 am

Re: The Rise And Fall Of Triumph Cars - How Tragedy KILLED a British ICON

Postby dutchman » Sat Mar 29, 2025 4:05 am

I'm nit-picking here but the only reason the Herald had a separate chassis-body construction was that Standard were unable to find a pressing plant willing to supply them with a one-piece unitary body. As a consequence the Herald was hugely expensive to manufacture compared to its competitors. There were also problems with getting a water-tight fit between the body and chassis on the earliest version, the Herald 948. This was aggravated by a new-fangled computer-controlled assembly line which I think was one of the first in the country?

As a result Standard-Triumph went bust just one year after the introduction of the Herald and were rescued by Leyland Motors in 1960 who then sorted out all the production issues. Oddly enough the original but problematic Herald 948 is now highly sought after by collectors.

Image
User avatar
dutchman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 55234
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:24 am
Location: Spon End


Return to Local History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Ads
cron