Taxpayers in Warwick district to cover 'six figure' bill after council is told to pay costs of developer's successful planning appealWarwick District Council's actions in rejecting a developer's controversial planning application to build hundreds of homes on land in the south of Leamington are set to cost the authority and, subsequently, taxpayers more than £100,000.
The council's planning committee had twice gone against officers' recommendations in rejecting AC Lloyd' s applications to build an initial 200 homes on land south of Chesterton Gardens in Whitnash.
But at the conclusion of a successful appeal by the developer to have permission granted last week, planning inspector Harold Stephens said the applications should never have been stopped and that the council displayed 'unreasonable behaviour' in blocking the development.
Residents, councillors and Warwick and Leamington MP Matt Western were among those who have opposed the plans for some time.
And today (Wednesday August 18) Mr Western has further expressed his anger - this time towards the cost of the council's actions in regard to application.
He said: “Warwick District Council chose not to provide evidence against proposals for the 200-home ‘East Whitnash’ development during the appeal to the government’s planning inspector – despite it being rejected twice by its own planning committee.
“In doing so the leadership disregarded its duty to residents.
“The public were against this proposal from the outset but the Conservative-led council forced it through in its Local Plan.
“It was rumoured the council was seeking to avoid the associated costs of contesting the appeal – costs that could take a significant chunk out of council coffers.
“This was clearly never going to be the case.
“The Planning Inspectorate has ruled that WDC is liable for costs after all.
“So not only has the council failed to prevent an unpopular development opposed by many hundreds of Sydenham residents, but it will also make them pay for it.
“It is an absolute insult - and rubs salt in the wounds.
“I will be asking some very serious questions about who will benefit from this development, and what discussions took place behind closed doors.”
