Revealed: The shocking true cost of Godiva the council did NOT reveal last month
An investigation has revealed the true extent of the Godiva Festival overspend and the cost of the failed gigs at the Ricoh Arena.
New figures released under the Freedom of Information Act found Godiva 2018 cost nearly £1 million – as the council admitted a true overspend of £479k and a ‘missing’ £100k from its accounts.
The Godiva’s woes came to light after a financial monitoring report in January revealed a £460,000 overspend on the festival, despite Coventry City Council only budgeting £150,000.
Last month, finance boss Cllr John Mutton blamed the overspend on axed Ricoh gigs for Ronan Keating – supported by Gabrielle – and Jonas Blue.
Ticket sales flopped for the council-funded concerts in March and April last year, with the authority shifting the acts to the Godiva schedule instead.
In December, a council scrutiny board meeting was told that change has led to a "small administrative loss" for the authority.
Officially, the council said £813,114 was spent on Godiva overall, £433,862 was made in income, with a £379,252 overspend.
Asked to explain how their overspend had dropped from £460,000, the council said its own figures circulated to councillors in January were wrong.
The council had agreed to pay £135,000 for the three acts to perform at the Ricoh gigs.
When those shows were switched to Godiva, the fee remained the same.
But only £35,000 of this was included in the overall Godiva costs
A whopping £100,000 has therefore not been factored into their figures, the council admitted.
That figure remains on the council's books as the cost of the failed efforts to stage the Ricoh Arena concerts.
However, if the remaining £100,000 figure for the Richo gigs is included as a Godiva cost, given the acts ended up performing at the festival, the true spend on Godiva was £913,114, while the true overspend is £479,252.
When the Ricoh gigs were discussed at a scrutiny meeting in December, however, a finance officer said they caused ‘a small administrative loss’ – the council now say “the exact overspend was not clear to officers present”.
