"Housing benefit for under-25s could be scrapped"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/ ... sfeed=true
There are two major problems with that statement. The first is that far fewer people over 60 now qualify as "pensioners" than did a few years ago. The other is that the money spent protecting pensioners will mean even bigger cuts for those who do not qualify as such.
The government could easily raise the state pension age to 70 or even 80 so that hardly anyone would ever qualify!
There is also an assumption by many people that everyone in receipt of housing benefit is "unemployed". In fact wages are so low in this country and rents so high that many people in full time employment also qualify for housing benefit. The remainder are mostly elderly or infirm.
David Cameron to unveil plans to save £10bn from welfare budget by 2016, but pensioners will be protected from cuts
There are two major problems with that statement. The first is that far fewer people over 60 now qualify as "pensioners" than did a few years ago. The other is that the money spent protecting pensioners will mean even bigger cuts for those who do not qualify as such.
The government could easily raise the state pension age to 70 or even 80 so that hardly anyone would ever qualify!

There is also an assumption by many people that everyone in receipt of housing benefit is "unemployed". In fact wages are so low in this country and rents so high that many people in full time employment also qualify for housing benefit. The remainder are mostly elderly or infirm.