Re: Libya: UK should prepare for the long haul - Number 10

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 2011 5:35 pm
by rebbonk
A war we ought not be involved in, one we cannot win, one we cannot afford!
I frankly believe that we're on very thin ice. Libya was (is) a civil war, Gaddafi wasn't (to my knowledge) causing trouble outside his own borders; we ought to have kept well out of it. Of course, it's quite a nice little diversion from the troubles our government have at home isn't it?
Re: Libya: UK should prepare for the long haul - Number 10

Posted:
Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:06 pm
by dutchman
Opinion polls have indicated that the longer the conflict continues, the less support there will be for British involvement from the electorate. Although after the previous examples of Aden, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan why anybody thought it was a good idea in the first place beats me?

Re: Libya: UK should prepare for the long haul - Number 10

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:33 am
by rebbonk
flapdoodle wrote:Just kill Gadaffi. It'll all be over then.
What right do we have to do that?
Re: Libya: UK should prepare for the long haul - Number 10

Posted:
Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:07 am
by rebbonk
flapdoodle wrote:rebbonk wrote:flapdoodle wrote:Just kill Gadaffi. It'll all be over then.
What right do we have to do that?
What right did Gadaffi have to take over the country by force and install himself as leader? Dictators like that shoukd be wiped out.
But then doesn't that make us as bad? - I suspect we'll have to agree to disagree on this.