Labour police boss ‘a disgrace’ for letting Maccabi chief constable retire
A Corbynite policing chief is under fire for allowing the Chief Constable behind the Israeli fan ban to retire instead of sacking him.
Simon Foster, the Labour police and crime commissioner (PCC) for the West Midlands, claimed that Craig Guildford had “acted with honour” by retiring on Friday afternoon.
Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, declared that she had lost confidence in Mr Guildford’s leadership as a result but could not sack him because that power lay with the local PCC – Mr Foster, a staunch Corbynite who once ran a local branch of Momentum.
Mr Foster refused to do so and said on Friday that he was “pleased” with the outcome, fuelling calls for his own resignation.
Gideon Falter, the chief executive of Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, said weak and indecisive handling of the situation by Mr Foster meant he should now also resign.
“The disgraceful conduct of Mr Guildford and Mr Foster shows who really rules the roost in local affairs in Birmingham. Focus must also turn to the Islamists who browbeat the police into carrying out their wishes to ban Jews, and the police and crime commissioner who has not lifted a finger to stop it,” he said.
Wendy Morton, the Conservative MP for Aldridge-Brownhills, said: “Whilst welcoming this decision, not least of all because the Chief Constable had lost the confidence of residents across the West Midlands, I am dismayed that the Labour West Midlands police and crime commissioner has been slow to respond and once again ducked his responsibilities.
“The police and crime commissioner has shown no leadership in this matter and he should also be leaving at 5pm this afternoon out of respect to all the residents of the West Midlands.”
Robert Alden, the leader of the Birmingham Conservatives, labelled Mr Foster “weak”.
“Yet again, the Labour police and crime commissioner has shown how weak he is,” Mr Alden said. “If the Chief Constable was responsible for the disgraceful banning of Jewish fans and the cover-up of intelligence relating to armed gangs in our city intent on hunting down and hurting people, then he should have been fired.”
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, added: “Craig Guildford should have been fired by the Labour police and crime commissioner – but he was too weak to act. Craig Guildford’s move to retire is simply not good enough.
“He should now face gross misconduct proceedings through an IOPC [Independent Office for Police Conduct] investigation – which can continue even after retirement or resignation. I will now be writing to the IOPC to call for this.”
Mr Guildford’s departure marks the second time he has been allowed to retire from the police. He stepped down in November 2024 for 31 days before being rehired in order to take advantage of a beneficial pension arrangement intended only for rank-and-file officers.
The Retire and Rehire scheme was introduced to encourage officers who had reached retirement age to stay on in their jobs without seeing their pension diminish.
West Midlands Police stated the scheme was open to officers up to the rank of inspector but exceptions for higher ranks could be made “if there was a business case to support it”.
The rules and regulations set out by the force also stated that the Chief Constable’s decision on who was eligible for the scheme was final. The move was signed off by Mr Foster.
Mr Foster, who alone had the power to sack Mr Guildford, refused to fire his Chief Constable, insisting he needed more time to consider the facts.
A former lawyer, Mr Foster had said it was important he followed due process and was planning to question Mr Guildford over the debacle at an accountability meeting scheduled for Jan 27.
Critics claimed the delay gave Mr Guildford the time to “lawyer up” and negotiate his departure under his own terms.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/16/maccabi-police-chief-retire-instead-of-sacked/