It has served the borough for more than half a centuryCouncil bosses have made the bombshell decision that the Civic Hall in Bedworth will never re-open. In fact it could be bulldozed as part of new regeneration plans for the town centre.
This afternoon (October 3) Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council has confirmed that the venue, which has served the borough for more than half a century, will remain closed. It has not played home to a show for more than three years.
It has been used as a Covid test centre before it became the borough's biggest vaccination hub. It has remained as a vaccination hub ever since.
But now, as the vaccination programme ends at the venue, a final decision has been made about its future. And that means it will not re-open again as an entertainment venue.
Back in the summer, a last gasp bid was made to try to secure its future and the council made an an expression of interest for Arts Council funding to help get the venue re-opened - but it failed. Now, facing having to find at least £1m to get the venue re-open, the ruling Conservatives have taken the decision to close it forever.
It is a move that is likely to cause anger in the community and is something that council leader, councillor Kris Wilson is acutely aware of. He admitted that it is one of the toughest decisions he had made so far as leader, but one he says has had to be made.
"I understand that people will have very very strong emotions and thoughts on this and it is not something I want to do if I am honest," he told CoventryLive. "I am in a position where it is just simply unsustainable and unaffordable."
He said he faced a head over heart dilemma, having fond memories of the venue himself. "I have had to get over my heart and listen to my head in coming to this decision," he said.
"The heart says keep it open, keep paying all these sums of money to keep it open. But when you put all of the facts into the equation, the logical conclusion, when the head comes in, it is not financially sustainable - we have other key crucial services that we have to provide.
"We have universal services we have to provide. Can we keep throwing significant amounts of money that very few people use and is poorly designed and is not fit for purpose any more?"